|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Action Research, Vol. 5, No. 4,
430-448 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1476750307077317
The cyclical process of action researchThe contribution of Gilles Deleuze
John S. Drummond
University of Dundee, UK, j.s.drummond{at}dundee.ac.uk
Markus Themessl-Huber
University of Dundee, UK, m.themesslhuber{at}dundee.ac.uk
Action Research is normally described as both a cyclical process and a participatory (democratic/egalitarian) undertaking. This article does not seek to contest the idiosyncrasies and pragmatics of the cyclical process involved in action research. Rather, it seeks to enrich it by developing further the idea of action research as a process that engages with problems and learning in the act of creating change. To do this we draw primarily on aspects of the work of the French philosopher, Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze has argued that all learning is essentially a direct apprentice-type engagement with the problematic nature of the material or project under consideration. We argue that an explication of what Deleuze means by this can augment our understanding of the contingencies involved in both the participatory and cyclical dimensions of action research. To give explanatory substance to Deleuze's potential contribution to action research, we use illustrative moments based on a hypothetical scenario of the development of a large piece of waste-ground into a community gardening project. We seek to connect aspects of Deleuzian philosophy to the cyclical process of action research to show the dynamic relationship between action researchers and an action research project. Our argument is that in doing this, an understanding of the variables involved in the cyclical process of action research may be enhanced.
Key Words: action research • an apprenticeship to signs • Deleuze • minoritorian • problems and solution • the actual and the virtual
References
- Ansell Pearson, K. (2002). Philosophy and the adventure of the virtual: Bergson and the time of life. London: Routledge.
- Bonta, M., & Protevi, J. (2004). Deleuze and geophilosophy: A guide and glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Chisholm, R.F., & Elden, M. (1993). Features of emerging action research. Human Relations, 46(2), 275—298.[Abstract]
- Colebrook, C. (2002). Gilles Deleuze. London: Routledge.
- Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (trans. P. Patton). London: The Athlone Press.
- Deleuze, G. (2000). Proust and signs (trans. R. Howard). London: The Athlone Press.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (trans. B. Massumi). London: The Athlone Press.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (trans. G. Burchell & H. Tomlinson). London: Verso.
- Dick, B. (2000). A beginner's guide to action research. Action Research Online. Retrieved 20 April 2006 from: www.uq.net.au/action_research/arp/guide.html.
- Elden, M., & Chisholm, R.F. (1993). Emerging varieties in action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46(2), 121—142.[Abstract]
- Grundy, S. (1988). Three modes of action research. In S. Kemmis & R. McTaggert (Eds.), The action research reader (pp. 352—361). Victoria: Deakin University Press.
- Hart, E., & Bond, M. (1995). Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Kemmis, S., & McTaggert, R. (1988). The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
- Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.
- May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- McMahon, T. (1999). Is reflective practice synonymous with action research? Educational Action Research, 7(1), 163—169.[CrossRef]
- McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.
- Patton, P. (2000). Deleuze and the political. London: Routledge.
- Rajchman, J. (2000). The Deleuze connections. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Rapaport, R.N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 23(6), 499—513.[CrossRef]
- Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.) (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
- Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & de Koning, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and guidance for assessment (Vol. 5, 23). Southampton: Health Technology Assessment.
- Williams, J. (2003). Gilles Deleuze's difference and repetition: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Williams, J. (2005). Understanding poststructuralism. London: Acumen.
- Winter, R. (1998). Managers, spectators and citizens: Where does `theory' come from in action research? Educational Action Research, 6(3), 361—376.[CrossRef]
- Winter, R. (2003). Action research, relativism and critical realism: A theoretical justification for action research. Retrieved 5 August 2006 from: http://www.did.stu.mmu.ac.uk/carn/Members_papers/Richard_Winter.html.
- Zuber-Skerrit, O. (1995). Models for action research. In S. Pinchen & R. Passfield (Eds.), Moving on: Creative applications of action learning and action research (pp. 3—29). Brisbane: ALARPM.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
