Action Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gustavsen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Action Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, 153-164 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/14767503030012003

New Forms of Knowledge Production and the Role of Action Research

Bjørn Gustavsen

Work Research Institute, Oslobjoern.gustavsen{at}afi.wri.no

In efforts to combine theory and practice, action research confronts a challenge that pertains to all kinds of research. It is, consequently, a challenge that is subject to much discussion, not least in fields like epistemology. These discussions provide valuable points and insights but they cannot be converted directly into research positions, which also demand consideration of practical issues. When research sets out to learn from practices a new challenge emerges: how is this learning to take place? Can the single researcher understand the world or is there a need for social relationships between (many) actors to develop this learning? This contribution discusses the theory-practice challenge and the need for new forms of social relationships within the research community itself.

Key Words: action research • critical theory • networking • phenomenology • pragmatism • social capital


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
L. Young
Editorial: Participatory Action Research (PAR): A Research Strategy for Nursing?
West J Nurs Res, August 1, 2006; 28(5): 499 - 504.
[PDF]


Home page
Action ResearchHome page
M. Foth
Network action research
Action Research, June 1, 2006; 4(2): 205 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
P. Reason
Choice and Quality in Action Research Practice
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2006; 15(2): 187 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
P. Reason
A Response to J.A. McKernan
Journal of Management Inquiry, June 1, 2006; 15(2): 207 - 208.
[PDF]


Home page
Action ResearchHome page
P. Reason
Editorial
Action Research, June 1, 2004; 2(2): 123 - 125.
[PDF]


Home page
Action ResearchHome page
H. Bradbury
Doing Work That Matters Despite the Obstacles: An Interview with Riane Eisler
Action Research, June 1, 2004; 2(2): 209 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Action ResearchHome page
H. Bradbury
Sustaining the Heart of Action Research(ers): An Interview with Joanna Macy
Action Research, October 1, 2003; 1(2): 208 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]